# Com-plete & Nat 3.1.6

**URL:** <https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/com-plete-nat-3-1-6/60454>\
**Category:** Forum\
**Tags:** Adabas-Natural, Natural, Natural-Related-Products, Com-plete\
**Created:** [January 19, 2006, 9:23pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/com-plete-nat-3-1-6/60454 "2006-01-19T21:23:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chris\_Walsh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b38774/32.png) [@Chris\_Walsh](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Chris_Walsh)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2006, 9:23pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/com-plete-nat-3-1-6/60454/1 "2006-01-19T21:23:53Z")

</div>

Another question regarding Com-Plete migration. How much does Com-Plete interact with Natural product(s)? We would like to install Com-Plete under Z/OS before we upgrade Natural from 3.1.6 to 4.1.4.

I realize we are out-of-support for Natural 3.1.6 but would prefer to have Com-Plete in prior to the Natural upgrade. Good idea? Bad idea? etc…

Thanks again  
Chris Walsh

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/original/3X/c/d/cd19967bb605d28a72d77eb83a1cae22f3df2eb8.svg) [@system](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2006, 9:42pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/com-plete-nat-3-1-6/60454/2 "2006-01-19T21:42:32Z")

</div>

The release notes for the current COM-PLETE Version, v6.4.1 state:

“Com-plete 6.4.1 is compatible to Natural version 3 and above. Natural 2.2 and 2.3 can be run, but their use is discouraged because they are not relocatable when used with Com-plete 6.4.1; this may result in reduced performance.”

So you’re fine with NAT316 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chris\_Walsh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b38774/32.png) [@Chris\_Walsh](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Chris_Walsh)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2006, 10:14pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/com-plete-nat-3-1-6/60454/3 "2006-01-19T22:14:27Z")

</div>

Thank you for your response(s), Wolfgang. They are appreciated. 😃

I did see the information your reference in the release notes but couldn’t determine whether the install of Com-Plete could possibly cause us any Nat 3.1.6 issues which would require a support call for Natural. I guess my true question is: Are all Com-Plete modules independant and separate from all Natural modules? The powers-that-be (management) here want assurance that Natural will not get broken by the install :shock:

Thanks again  
Chris Walsh

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/original/3X/c/d/cd19967bb605d28a72d77eb83a1cae22f3df2eb8.svg) [@system](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2006, 11:25pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/com-plete-nat-3-1-6/60454/4 "2006-01-19T23:25:03Z")

</div>

Basically installing NATURAL into COM-PLETE is analogous to any other environment, you create either a shared nucleus + environment dependent frontend, or a “local” nucleus including everything.

Then there’s the NATURAL bufferpool manager which needs to be installed as a COM-PLETE “server” (i.e. somewhat like a “service”).

But there are no clashes due to the different environments.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/original/3X/c/d/cd19967bb605d28a72d77eb83a1cae22f3df2eb8.svg) [@system](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2021, 2:40pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/com-plete-nat-3-1-6/60454/5 "2021-04-02T14:40:25Z")

</div>