# invalid TCP Header received ?

**URL:** <https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/invalid-tcp-header-received/59052>\
**Category:** Forum\
**Tags:** Mainframe-Integration, EntireX\
**Created:** [November 9, 2004, 4:29pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/invalid-tcp-header-received/59052 "2004-11-09T16:29:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sedo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@Sedo](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Sedo)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2004, 4:29pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/invalid-tcp-header-received/59052/1 "2004-11-09T16:29:40Z")

</div>

Dear Friends,  
  
  
How can i solve this problem ?  
  
  
by " BROKER with CLASS RPC" Call , we receive   
  
  
“Broker Error 0013 0310: Broker call failed: Invalid TCP header received, length = 20”   
  
  
  
Here is the Profile for it !  
  
11:14:47 \*\*\*\*\* NATURAL SYSPARM UTILITY \*\*\*\*\* 2004-11-09  
 - Display Profile -   
\> RPC=(SERVER=ON,SRVNODE=BKRXXX,SRVNAME=SPBBNXX,MAXBUFF=28,SIZE=128,TRANSP=ACI,TRACE=0) \<  
Which parameter is responsible for this error ?  
  
thank you in advance  
  
  
kind Regards ,  
  
Serdar

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rolf\_Bahlke](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/user_avatar/techcommunity.softwareag.com/rolf_bahlke/32/109_2.png) [@Rolf\_Bahlke](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Rolf_Bahlke)\
**Post date:** [November 9, 2004, 5:26pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/invalid-tcp-header-received/59052/2 "2004-11-09T17:26:21Z")

</div>

Dear Sedo,  
  
you get this error in a Java application which is issuing Broker calls. Basically, the problem is that the Broker cannot process the request issued by the Java application in the TCP/IP communicator.  
  
There are 2 ways to get more information: you might check the output of the TCP/IP communicator task for error messages. Or you can run the Java application with trace enabled, use -Dentirex.trace=3 in this case and post the output here or send it to support.  
  
Usually this error is due to resource shortages (especially NUM-COMBUF and NUM-WQE).  
  
Kind regards,  
Rolf

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sedo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@Sedo](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Sedo)\
**Post date:** [November 11, 2004, 4:28pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/invalid-tcp-header-received/59052/3 "2004-11-11T16:28:48Z")

</div>

Dear Rolf,  
  
you wrote ;  
  
" There are 2 ways to get more information: you might check the output of the TCP/IP communicator task for error messages. "  
  
Could you please explain me a little bit more ?  
  
I send to you a section from file  
  
ETB.TCP.RCVR.00908.996  
  
  
14.10.2004:06.09.20:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Receive Task started  
03.11.2004:09.26.48:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:09.35.01:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.40.46:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.46.44:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for TcpCon buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.46.44:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::TcpConRecv: rc: 1, errno:10014  
03.11.2004:10.46.58:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.46.58:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.47.24:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.47.37:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.47.41:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.47.41:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.48.57:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.50.17:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.50.17:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.56.49:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.56.49:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.57.18:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.57.18:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.57.33:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.57.37:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for TcpCon buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.57.37:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::TcpConRecv: rc: 1, errno:10014  
03.11.2004:10.57.49:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.57.49:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.57.53:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.57.56:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for TcpCon buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.57.56:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::TcpConRecv: rc: 1, errno:10014  
03.11.2004:10.58.08:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.58.09:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.58.18:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for TcpCon buffer failed  
03.11.2004:10.58.18:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::TcpConRecv: rc: 1, errno:10014  
04.11.2004:10.50.15:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
05.11.2004:15.17.11:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
09.11.2004:14.35.50:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
10.11.2004:08.49.28:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
10.11.2004:11.01.01:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
10.11.2004:13.39.47:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
10.11.2004:14.19.02:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
10.11.2004:14.19.02:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
10.11.2004:14.24.01:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
10.11.2004:14.25.16:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
10.11.2004:14.25.36:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for TcpCon buffer failed  
10.11.2004:14.25.36:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::TcpConRecv: rc: 1, errno:10014  
11.11.2004:08.10.58:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
11.11.2004:08.10.58:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
11.11.2004:08.11.26:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
11.11.2004:08.12.05:ETB:5.3.1.5::I::Allocate memory for Reply buffer failed  
  
and our attribute file :  
  
\*\* ENTIRE Broker attributes \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*  
  
_**DEFAULTS = BROKER  
 AUTOLOGON = YES   
 BROKER-ID = ETB097  
 TCPPORT = 1972  
 CLIENT-NONACT = 5M  
 CONV-DEFAULT = 1000   
 LONG-BUFFER-DEFAULT = 200  
 NUM-CLIENT = 200  
 NUM-CONVERSATION = 5000  
 NUM-LONG-BUFFER = 200  
 NUM-SERVER = 100  
 NUM-SERVICE = 100  
 NUM-SHORT-BUFFER = 5000  
 NUM-WORKER = 3  
 SECURITY = NO   
 SERVICE-UPDATES = YES   
 SHORT-BUFFER-DEFAULT = 1000  
 TRACE-LEVEL = 0  
 NUM-CCOM = 5  
 NUM-COMBUF = 100  
 NUM-WQE = 200**_  
  
 _**MAX-UOWS=30  
 MAX-MSG=1000000  
 DEFERRED=YES  
 STORE=BROKER  
 PSTORE=COLD  
 UWSTATP=1  
 UWTIME=10M**_  
  
 Broker Parameters introduced in ETB52 \*  
 **_TRANSPORT=TCP-NET   
 MESSAGE-CASE=UPPER  
 SECURITY-PATH=usrsec.dll   
 PSTORE-PATH=btpsi.dll_   
 ODBC-PARMS=UOWODBC.txt**   
  
 ENTIRE Broker Services \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*  
  
 _------------- some example services -------------------------_  
  
_DEFAULTS = SERVICE  
 CONV-LIMIT = UNLIM  
 CONV-NONACT = 4M  
 LONG-BUFFER-LIMIT = UNLIM  
 NOTIFY-EOC = YES  
 SERVER-NONACT = 5M  
 SHORT-BUFFER-LIMIT = UNLIM  
 TRANSLATION = SAGTCHA  
 TRANSLATION = c:\brokerexit\tranexit.dll   
CONVERSION = SAGTCHA_   
  
 _CLASS = ACLASS, SERVER = ASERVER, SERVICE = ASERVICE  
 CLASS = BCLASS, SERVER = BSERVER, SERVICE = BSERVICE  
 CLASS = CCLASS, SERVER = CSERVER, SERVICE = CSERVICE  
 CLASS = GAME, SERVER = CHESS, SERVICE = MAIL_  
  
 _------------- ENTIREX/NATURAL RPC services -------------------------_  
  
_DEFAULTS = SERVICE  
 CONV-NONACT = 5M  
 NOTIFY-EOC = NO  
 SERVER-NONACT = 3M  
 SHORT-BUFFER-LIMIT = UNLIM  
 TRANSLATION = SAGTCHA_  
 TRANSLATION = sagtrpc.dll   
  
\<\<\<\<\<\<\<\< 50 services like this \>\>\>\>\>\>\>\>\>\>\>\>  
CLASS = RPC , SERVER = SEBBNAU1 , SERVICE = CALLNAT  
  
  
Please write your recommendation about these values !   
  
  
Thank you in advance !  
  
kind Regards,  
  
Sedo

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sedo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@Sedo](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Sedo)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2004, 8:19pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/invalid-tcp-header-received/59052/4 "2004-11-12T20:19:23Z")

</div>

we have increased NUM-COMBUF Parameter. Now we are testing the environment.   
  
It seems to work 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sedo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ec9cab/32.png) [@Sedo](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Sedo)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2004, 2:44pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/invalid-tcp-header-received/59052/5 "2004-11-16T14:44:18Z")

</div>

Increasing of value  
  
\<\< NUM-COMBUF \>\> from 100 to 150  
  
helped to solve this problem.   
  
Thank you !  
  
  
ciao  
  
Sedo

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/original/3X/c/d/cd19967bb605d28a72d77eb83a1cae22f3df2eb8.svg) [@system](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2021, 2:39pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/invalid-tcp-header-received/59052/6 "2021-04-02T14:39:37Z")

</div>


