# Missing segmentsfields in EDIFACT

**URL:** <https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/missing-segmentsfields-in-edifact/108354>\
**Category:** Forum\
**Tags:** EDI\
**Created:** [July 30, 2003, 7:35pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/missing-segmentsfields-in-edifact/108354 "2003-07-30T19:35:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guest](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/user_avatar/techcommunity.softwareag.com/guest/32/75_2.png) [@Guest](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Guest)\
**Post date:** [July 30, 2003, 7:35pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/missing-segmentsfields-in-edifact/108354/1 "2003-07-30T19:35:29Z")

</div>

Hi All,

Does anyone encountered the problem that the UNEDIFACT (e.g. D.97A INVOIC) messages are not complete which can be downloaded from webMethods or when generated based on a SEF file?

I noticed that the ones downloaded from the webMethods site are missing fields below the UNS segment and that ones generated based on a SEF file are missing composite fields (e.g. NAD/NAD02).

Does this mean that I have to make some mannual adjustments because these are the two ways (I know) of generating templates and record structures?

You can download a sample SEF file from [url=“[http://www.edidev.com/downloadsef.htm](http://www.edidev.com/downloadsef.htm)”][http://www.edidev.com/downloadsef.htm[/url]](http://www.edidev.com/downloadsef.htm%5B/url%5D)

Thnx,  
Hugo

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/original/3X/c/d/cd19967bb605d28a72d77eb83a1cae22f3df2eb8.svg) [@system](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2021, 3:05pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/missing-segmentsfields-in-edifact/108354/2 "2021-04-02T15:05:11Z")

</div>