# OIOUBL EDI-format from EDIModule

**URL:** <https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621>\
**Category:** Forum\
**Tags:** EDI\
**Created:** [December 3, 2014, 4:30pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621 "2014-12-03T16:30:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aleksandrs\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/439d5e/32.png) [@Aleksandrs\_T](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Aleksandrs_T)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2014, 4:30pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621/1 "2014-12-03T16:30:09Z")

</div>

Hello,

Client wants to use OIOUBL EDI format. Google haven’t provided any information about support possibility in webMethods. The one thing what I have found is that OIOUBL is a subset of UBL 2.0

We are using webMethods Integration Server 7.1.3 and EDI Module with version 6.5.2 (without mentioned above format available in list of document types)

Since I’m not familiar with EDI formats, I hope that someone can help me on this thread, and can tell me how I could integrate this format.

Kind Regards,  
Aleksandrs

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rmg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/278dde/32.png) [@rmg](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/rmg)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2014, 8:07pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621/2 "2014-12-05T20:07:12Z")

</div>

Please you should open a ticket with SAG tech support and check if they support this format part of EDI module and I think it was not supported and never heard with it.

Also do you have still extended maintenance contract for your 7.x env with them check it before hand?

HTH,  
RMG

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MR\_as173d](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/user_avatar/techcommunity.softwareag.com/mr_as173d/32/744_2.png) [@MR\_as173d](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/MR_as173d)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2014, 4:47am UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621/3 "2014-12-07T04:47:56Z")

</div>

Hi There,

SAG webMethods doesn’t support this, but if you approach SAG with OIOUBL atleast they can think to implement this in new releases. Kindly update us once you interact with SAG.

Thanks,

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rmg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/278dde/32.png) [@rmg](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/rmg)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2014, 5:03pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621/4 "2014-12-08T17:03:08Z")

</div>

Yes you should also put as a feature request in the SAG brain storm site and discuss the new standard with SAG support.

HTH,  
RMG

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aleksandrs\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/439d5e/32.png) [@Aleksandrs\_T](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Aleksandrs_T)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2014, 5:51pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621/5 "2014-12-08T17:51:31Z")

</div>

Hi all,

Many thanks for your replies regarding this call. So I have solved this question.

The OIOUBL is Danish customization of UBL 2.0 (also there exist a lot of customization in each country sectors). Also we had already implemented EHF conversion program (Norwegian customization of UBL 2.0) using xsd schema for CreditNote from UBL 2.0

So, the solution how to start handle the OIOUBL invoices, is to download UBL-Invoice-2.0.xsd and implement in package.

@rmg: No, the support contract with Software AG regarding maintenance IS 7.x is ended last year.

KR,

Aleksandrs

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rmg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/278dde/32.png) [@rmg](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/rmg)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2014, 10:58pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621/6 "2014-12-08T22:58:16Z")

</div>

So what I see this is no relational/link with EDI Module for implementing this standard right?

How are you going to handle the parsing is it same as any other open-standard XML like OAGIS?

HTH,  
RMG

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aleksandrs\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/439d5e/32.png) [@Aleksandrs\_T](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/Aleksandrs_T)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2014, 9:30am UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621/7 "2014-12-09T09:30:01Z")

</div>

Hi,

Yes, there no any dependencies with EDI module. I’m going to create document type in webMethods Developer using as source an xml schema. The parsing will be completed using following services (WmPublic package):

1. pub.xml:xmlStringToXMLNode
2. pub.xml:xmlNodeToDocument
3. pub.schema:validate

Then this IS document type going to be passed to flow service which makes conversion.

BR,

Aleksandrs

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rmg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/278dde/32.png) [@rmg](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/rmg)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2014, 5:24pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621/8 "2014-12-10T17:24:55Z")

</div>

Thanks and it make sense and straight fwd like any other custom XML data processing.

HTH,  
RMG

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/original/3X/c/d/cd19967bb605d28a72d77eb83a1cae22f3df2eb8.svg) [@system](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2021, 3:32pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/oioubl-edi-format-from-edimodule/179621/9 "2021-04-02T15:32:31Z")

</div>


