# Problem while update from 6.1 to version 6.5

**URL:** <https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995>\
**Category:** Forum\
**Tags:** EDI\
**Created:** [December 20, 2009, 10:57pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995 "2009-12-20T22:57:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ou\_yiran](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ccd318/32.png) [@ou\_yiran](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/ou_yiran)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2009, 10:57pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995/1 "2009-12-20T22:57:42Z")

</div>

Hi , All

I have faced a problem in converting EDI file,Using convertToString flow service .  
For Example ,  
In the version 6.1 , refer to the same record,the result will be:  
…  
ST 0001 850000001  
…  
But after import the package into the version 6.5,refer to the same record ,the result will be:  
…  
ST 0001 850000000001  
…

I have noticed that the contentType of ST02 in version 6.1 is Type329.

It quite confuse me ,Is there any patch or any suggection ?  
Thank you .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gupta\_r.17495](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9fc348/32.png) [@gupta\_r.17495](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/gupta_r.17495)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2009, 9:55pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995/2 "2009-12-21T21:55:59Z")

</div>

Which package did you imported 6.1 to 6.5? Also what’s the EDI Version and is the schema EDIFFSchema.X12.V4010:T850?

Yes the ST02 IDCode is 329 will remain same as earlier EDI Module releases.

HTH,  
RMg

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ou\_yiran](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ccd318/32.png) [@ou\_yiran](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/ou_yiran)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2009, 4:54am UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995/3 "2009-12-22T04:54:16Z")

</div>

Thanks RMG,

We are upgrating the platform from webMethods 6.1 to webMethods 6.5 ,As planned ,  
Our packages wirriten by ourselevs will be on webMethods 6.5.  
The fuction of our package is to convert out EDI file,eg.EDI850 .  
In the flow service ,We use wm.b2b.edi:convertToString to create EDI string ,The parameter of ffschema is set ‘EDIRecord.EDI810:EDI810’ , It is generated from XML Schema.

In the version 6.1 , after convertToString ,the result is:  
…  
ST 0001 850000001  
…  
In the version 6.5 , after convertToString ,the result is::  
…  
ST 0001 850000000001  
…

Please kindly give us further suggestion ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ou\_yiran](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ccd318/32.png) [@ou\_yiran](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/ou_yiran)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2009, 4:59am UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995/4 "2009-12-22T04:59:08Z")

</div>

add , We does not use EDIFFSchema.X12.V4010:T850 ,althougth using EDIFFSchema.X12.V4010:T850 will solve the problem ,Changing the flow service will bring big workload .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gupta\_r.17495](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9fc348/32.png) [@gupta\_r.17495](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/gupta_r.17495)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2009, 9:11pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995/5 "2009-12-22T21:11:37Z")

</div>

But i advice you start using the EDI Module provided standard schema  
EDIFFSchema.X12.V4010:T850,Document out of it.Yes i understand the workload code changes etc…,at some point you got to deal with it for future SAG support.

HTH,  
RMg

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ou\_yiran](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/ccd318/32.png) [@ou\_yiran](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/ou_yiran)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2009, 9:34pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995/6 "2009-12-22T21:34:46Z")

</div>

Thanks RMG,

In the forum , I have seen there is patch for upgrating yestemday.Not sure whether the problem will be solved by patch .Now I will use standard schema.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gupta\_r.17495](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9fc348/32.png) [@gupta\_r.17495](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/gupta_r.17495)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2009, 9:59pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995/7 "2009-12-22T21:59:34Z")

</div>

Great…give it a shot!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/techcommunity/original/3X/c/d/cd19967bb605d28a72d77eb83a1cae22f3df2eb8.svg) [@system](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2021, 3:05pm UTC](https://techcommunity.softwareag.com/t/problem-while-update-from-6-1-to-version-6-5/109995/8 "2021-04-02T15:05:59Z")

</div>


