I see that we have defined ASSO, DATA, WORK, SORT, CLOG and PLOG with DEVICE=8391. The documentation (Device and File Considerations) states that DEVICE=8390, 8391, 8392, and 8393 is suitable for 3390 device types, and specifies the block size and RABNs per track associated with each device. We are currently using 3390 mod 9 devices and have just been asked to clone this system using 3390 mod 27 disk packs. Should we continue to define these with DEVICE=8391?
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| usage of 3390 model ?? dasd | 1 | 21598 | August 15, 2006 | |
| Moving from 3390-3 to 3390-9 | 10 | 13580 | October 6, 2015 | |
| Adabas usgae of 3390 type DASD | 1 | 15448 | August 5, 2009 | |
| MIXING ONE DATA DSN WITH MOD-3 AND ANOTHER WITH MOD-9 | 2 | 1123 | December 1, 2018 | |
| Reacjing the Limits of Volumes. | 3 | 7294 | October 9, 2009 |